In place of enjoyable definitely in it, Srinivasan dismisses the brand new traditional proposition due to the fact coercive, homophobic, and you may patriarchal
Although activity of an excellent philosopher is always to criticize perhaps not this new weakest and/or most well known variety of a suggestion, however the most effective and more than persuasive one to. Including, Srinivasan might determine an arrangement in which gay marriage is desired, in which breakup- not remarriage-is welcome, and also du kan kolla hГ¤r in and that you can find norms up against nonmarital intercourse. (Such norms is implemented in any manner Srinivasan believes we is always to demand almost every other norms facing problematic consensual sex, like the norms up against college student–teacher gender one to she defends.) We can including suppose divorce words will be as beneficial so you can female due to the fact Srinivasan wishes, due to the fact a protect against points where ladies are unwilling to get off abusive dating.
In the long run, Srinivasan’s objection in order to conventional sexual morality is just the liberal one to: that it’s incorrect so you can restriction individual alternatives, although this ‘s the only way to deal with architectural injustice. Despite the lady criticism regarding liberal feminism, this lady disagreement seems to be: “Liberalism is actually crappy; conservative intimate morality was illiberal; therefore old-fashioned intimate morality is actually bad.”