Towards the odds of kissing to the target, there is a critical communications ranging from grandiose narcissism and you may new member intercourse, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. It communication is shown within the Fig 2. The easy mountains for males (effortless hill = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you will ladies (effortless mountain = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) just weren’t significant. Grandiose narcissists failed to express a heightened odds of kissing that have a connected target over just one (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating one grandiose narcissism wasn’t with the mate poaching for a short-name affair.
Grandiose narcissists usually statement spouse poaching -particularly for the short-name . not, a concern stays regarding if they pick members of matchmaking more really worth looking for than just people that are unmarried. Widman and you may McNulty reason that grandiose narcissistic inclinations could be activated across the situations normally (for instance the mind-report regarding lives incidence of intimate conclusion), yet coffee meets bagel coupons not be activated whenever placed in a specific state. Ergo, you’ll be able you to definitely grandiose narcissists disclose a history of entertaining from inside the mate poaching, but do not necessarily get a hold of those in relationship as finest friends. I examined this chance during the four degree.
Companion poaching directory.
For very long-identity lover poaching, grandiose narcissism is a critical predictor for females (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you will a somewhat tall predictor for men (? = .218, t = 1.725, p = .088). None of your own Huge Five parameters have been tall. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a significant predictor away from achievement at the poaching on the long-name for men (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nonetheless it was for women (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = .021). Not one of your other factors have been extreme except for ladies neuroticism; when people was indeed a whole lot more neurotic, it said significantly more achievements within poaching for a long-name sexual relationship.
Performance
Of interest, grandiose narcissism wasn’t of this spouse poaching certainly boys. That it outcome is in keeping with show advertised by Kardum and you will associates . Therefore, it’s possible you to grandiose narcissistic women are more often bad from spouse poaching.
Materials and you may process
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.
