Like, attract, and suppression away from opinion out-of personal selection

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you may People Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.

Cross-sectional studies from intimacy, welfare, and you may union: Testing the fresh presumptions of one’s triangular concept off like

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The area out-of attachment in the dating deaf human mating. Report about General Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet contradiction reviewed. Diary out of Social Situations, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A personal technology one to reduces social wedding and you can mental really-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.M., & Fields, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, time, and you may time of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Current Population Account, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Effect top regarding the undertaking tough: Societal reviews in this romantic dating. Journal out-of Identification and you can Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Diary from Identification and you may Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you’re able to attractive selection: Brand new changed mindset off dating repairs. Evolution and you will Person Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential analysis regarding conflict and you will agreement from inside the troubled and you will nondistressed relationship lovers. Diary from Consulting and you can Health-related Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Green, Good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationships development on line: What is the huge appeal? Log out-of Public Factors, 58(1), 9–31.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). Some great benefits of positive illusions: Idealization additionally the build off pleasure during the intimate dating. Log from Identification and you will Social Mindset, 70(1), 79–98.

Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-evaluation intentions in the personal relationships: A model of global enhancement and you will certain confirmation. Inside the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Skills ents in the study of pair correspondence (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College or university Push.

Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit knowledge out-of close rivalry

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-specialist bond through the lens out of accessory theory. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Routine, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The latest public monitoring system: Improved susceptibility so you’re able to social signs as the an adaptive response to societal difference. Inside K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The new societal outcast: Ostracism, social exception, rejection, and you may bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Psychology Press.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Global and you will particular relational activities from the experience of social relationships. Log out of Personality and Personal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can guidance trying to inside the romantic relationships. Character and Social Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you will certain accessory representations in adulthood: Is there a romance?. Log Out-of Societal And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. An effective. (2001)mitment and you may matchmaking restoration systems. Within the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal romantic relationships: Repairs and you can enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection actually effect among partners given that a function of brand new similarity within mutual event. Character And Personal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Results of salience out-of extrinsic advantages for the liking and enjoying. Log away from Identification and you will Societal Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.