Analyses that have thinking and you can criterion because the oriented details don’t have clear temporary purchasing while the every ideational situations were measured while doing so at the baseline. Parental attitudes essentially exist just before children’s perceptions and you will, whenever you are there may be certain influence away from kid’s thinking towards the parental perceptions, the bulk of the newest intergenerational influences concerning the thinking mostly work off mothers so you can youngsters (Thornton mais aussi al. 2008). Subsequent, prior research indicates that thinking dictate standards, in the place of traditional influencing thinking (Fishbein and you will Ajzen 2010). It is of use, although not, to store the potential of reciprocal causation anywhere between thinking regarding parents and children planned even as we understand efficiency, together with possibility of contrary causation in which criterion determine perceptions.
Performance
Basic, i examined hypothesis step one because of the examining if the children’s relationship timing attitudes end up like its parents’ thinking (Arrow step one, Fig. 1 ). Coefficients out of linear regression models of child’s better many years on wedding are provided in the Desk step 3 . Whenever moms and dads really worth older decades at wedding, their children try a whole lot more attending value elderly years, nevertheless the feeling size is modest. Each extra year away from most readily useful many years provided by a mother and dad is of the a rise off 0.05 and 0.07 many years, respectively, within the kid’s greatest ages (Habits 1 and you may dos). Such self-confident coefficients getting mothers’ and you will fathers’ best ages plus continue to be a similar or was quite smaller in the event the a couple details was within the same equation (Design step 3). Given that part guess having fathers’ finest years (0.07) was quite larger than regarding mothers’ (0.05), so it difference in the coefficients is not statistically significant.
Dining table 3
Coefficients and you may powerful fundamental mistakes out-of ordinary least squares regressions regarding child’s ideal ages within relationship (attitudes) (n = 1562)
* p step one ) and theory step three you to parents’ timing attitudes privately determine kid’s standard, websites of child’s own perceptions (Arrow step three, Fig. step one ). The brand new purchased logistic regression varieties of child’s expectation away from just how in the future they’re going to get married is actually listed in Table cuatro . Designs step 1–4 level time attitudes since the better decades at the matrimony, when you are Designs 5–8 level time attitudes because of the evaluating kid’s baseline ages on the selection of appropriate years.
Desk 4
Children’s and mothers’ most useful years did apply to child’s requirement. Affirmed, when people as well as their moms and dads valued earlier most readily useful decades, people was in fact less planning to anticipate to marry in the near future. Especially, the odds rates to own best many years in the relationships is actually 0.80 for the children (Design step 1) and you may 0.93 getting parents (Model 2) (Table 4 ). By contrast, chances proportion to own dad’s top chronilogical age of 0.97 is nearly you to and never statistically high (Design 3, Desk cuatro ). This type of consequences also are separate; in the complete design along with jeevansathi ProfilovГ© vyhledГЎvГЎnГ about three family’s top many years, the chances percentages hold almost regular (Model cuatro, Desk cuatro ).
The purpose rates strongly recommend child’s individual greatest decades provides the best impact on their standard, when you find yourself mother’s most readily useful many years are reduced influential and fathers’ most readily useful decades keeps a slight influence otherwise nothing after all. Modified Wald evaluating show that the chances rates towards the children’s finest many years differ somewhat regarding possibility rates for both mother’s and you can dad’s best decades. However, the effects off mothers’ and fathers’ top ages into the kid’s requirement do not differ rather.
Whenever computing timing attitudes of the contrasting kid’s ages toward acceptable marriage age brackets for a person of the gender, there’s then research that children and you may parents is one another influential, in different methods. When children’s many years are compared to the their unique time thinking, an obvious “too quickly” impact is offered. If it’s more five years “too quickly,” college students provides about one-1 / 2 of the odds from looking to marry in the future compared to whenever it is 3–5 years “too soon” (Models 5 and you may 8). The point quotes of 1.31 (Design 5) and step one.thirty five (Design 8) suggest that when it is this new “correct time” children provides higher probability of looking to marry in the future compared to in case it is step 3–5 years “too quickly,” however these outcomes are not statistically extreme. The point estimate for the kids just below this new acceptable variety, from the step one–two years “too early,” suggests he could be quite expected to be prepared to marry soon with area prices of 1.17 (Design 5) and step one.13 (Design 8), nevertheless these consequences also are not statistically extreme.
